Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3839 (PAT)

Rohit Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./83263/2025 · 2026-03-30

Sandeep Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83263 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-288 Year-2025 Thana- KAUWAKOL District- Nawada ====================================================== Rohit Kumar S/O Ayush Manjhi @ Abju Manjhi R/O Vill.- Khaira, P.S.- Kawakole, Dist - Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Sumiya Devi W/o Giro Manjhi R/o- Village - Khaira, P.S. - Kawakole District - Nawada. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Birendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 5 30-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kawakole P.S. Case No. 288/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 87 of B.N.S. 3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner is alleged to have kidnapped the daughter of the informant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that from the statement of the victim, it appears that the petitioner and the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83263 of 2025(5) dt.30-03-2026 2/2 victim were in a relationship. Petitioner has clean antecedent and he is in custody since 19.07.2025. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial. 5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this application for regular bail is allowed. 7. Considering the aforesaid, this application is allowed and the provisional bail granted to the petitioner vide order dated 3.12.2025, is hereby confirmed and the petitioner will remain on the same bail bonds as executed by him earlier. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T