Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38388 (RAJ)

TALWANDI SABO POWER LIMITED AND ORS v. STATE OF RAJ AND ANR

CRLMP/1466/2018 · 2025-08-01

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:29390] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1466/2018 1. Talwandi Sabo Power Limited Through Its Authorised Signatory Jasmeet Wadehra, Having Its Registered Office at Mansa, Village Banwala, Mansa Talwandi Sabo Road, District Mansa, Punjab 151302, India 2. Mr. Varun Arora S/o Sudhir Kumar, aged about 24 years, R/o Talwandi Sabo Power Limited, Village Banwala, Mansa Talwandi Sabo Road, District Mansa, Punjab 151302, India. 3. Mr. Laxmi Kant Jaiswal S/o Late SS Jaiswal, aged about 46 years, R/o Talwandi Sabo Power Limited, Village Banwala, Mansa Talwandi Sabo Road, District Mansa, Punjab 151302, India. 4. Mr. Ravimaran P. S/o K Panneerselvam, aged about 39 years, R/o Talwandi Sabo Power Limited, Village Banwala, Mansa Talwandi Sabo Road, District Mansa, Punjab 151302, India. 5. Mr. Vijay Ingole S/o A R Ingole, aged about 43 years, R/o Talwandi Sabo Power Limited, Village Banwala, Mansa Talwandi Sabo Road, District Mansa, Punjab 151302, India. 6. Mr. Nrusimha Tharra S/o Tharra Ramana, aged about 38 years, R/o Talwandi Sabo Power Limited, Village Banwala, Mansa Talwandi Sabo Road, District Mansa, Punjab 151302, India. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through PP 2. Mukesh Gupta, aged about 43 years, S/o Mr. Kalyan Sahay Gupta, Proprietor Shri Govardhan Steel, R/o 12- 13, Karni Vihar B, Road No.17, B.k.i. Araria, Vishwakarma, Jaipur, Raj., India. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sneh Deep Khyaliya, Adv. assisted by Mr. Manish Parmar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP [2025:RJ-JP:29390] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1466/2018] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 01/08/2025 1. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the factual report, the same is taken on record. 2. The factual report shows that the Final report has already been submitted. 3. Considering the fact that the FR has already been submitted the instant petition has become infructuous. However, the petitioners are at liberty to file the petition afresh, if the situation so arises. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with the liberty to approach this Court, if the situation so arises. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-14