VIKAS SHARMA S/O YUGAL KISHORE SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/13312/2025 · 2025-11-20
Anand Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38385 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38385 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:46865] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.13312/2025 Vikas Sharma S/o Yugal Kishore Sharma, R/o 34, Rajputo Ka Mohalla, Pithawas, Hathoj, Kalwar Road, P.S. Kardhani, Commisionerate (West), Jaipur. Proprietor, Krishna Enterprises, Kalwar Road, Jaipur. (At Present Accused Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Accused/Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Gupta with Mr. Harshit Bhatt, Mr. Saurabh Yadav & Mr. Chinmay Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 20/11/2025
1. This criminal miscellaneous bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in respect of FIR No.249/2025 registered at Police Station-C.P.S. Jaipur, District-ACB District, for the offences punishable under Sections 7 & 7A of the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018 and Section 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not a public servant and has falsely been framed by the prosecution, whereas he has not committed any offence whatsoever. It is further submitted that investigation in
[2025:RJ-JP:46865] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13312/2025] the instant matter qua the petitioner has been completed and charge-sheet has already been filed against him. Hence, petitioner is no longer required for any custodial interrogation. He is behind the Bars since 21.09.2025, and trial is likely to take considerably long time, therefore, the accused-petitioner may be allowed to be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the present bail application and submitted that still the public servant, who has been implicated in the FIR has not been arrested, therefore, releasing the petitioner on bail would prejudice investigation of the prosecution. 4. Considered the submissions made at Bar. 5. In light of the facts that in the instant matter, investigation qua the petitioner has already been completed and the charge-sheet has also been filed. Looking to the fact that the accused-petitioner is not a public servant and he is behind the Bars since 21.09.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this Bail Application is hereby allowed.
The accused-petitioner Vikas Sharma S/o Yugal Kishore Sharma shall be released on bail in pursuance of FIR No.249/2025 registered at Police Station-C.P.S. Jaipur, District-ACB District on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each. That apart, the accused-petitioner shall also follow the conditions as under:-
[2025:RJ-JP:46865] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13312/2025] (i) He shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) He shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) He shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless his presence is exempted by the trial Court. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/3