[2025:RJ-JP:23868] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 847/2025 1. Munfed S/o Taiyab, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Toda, Po- lice Station Khoh, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 2. Akram S/o Fatti, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village Gadhi Mewat, Police Station Khoh, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Accused-Applicants Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5506/2025 Taslim S/o Janmohammad @ Janu, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Gad- himewat, Police Station Khoh District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Accused-Applicant Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Anoop Kumar, Adv. Mr. Girish Khandelwal, Adv. Mr. Surendra Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, Dy.GA Mr. Shriram Dhakad, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 30/06/2025 1. As both the bail applications have been filed against the order of dismissal of bail applications of the present accused- applicants pertaining to the same FIR, they are being heard and decided by the instant common order. 2. The present bail applications have been filed by the accused- applicants under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 against the orders dated 08.01.2025 and 03.04.2025 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge Deeg, District Bharatpur [2025:RJ-JP:23868] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-847/2025] (Raj.) arising out of FIR No.279/2024 registered at Police Station Khoh, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 111(2)(a), 303(2), 308(2), 313, 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 61(2)(a) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66-D of I.T. Act, by which the bail applications of the accused-applicants under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023 have been dismissed. 3. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants submits that the accused-applicants have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants also submits that the accused-applicants namely; Munfed and Akram were arrested on 29.12.2024 and the accused-applicant Taslim was arrested on 28.03.2025 and since then, they are behind the bars. Learned counsel further submits that charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take long time to conclude. Learned counsel contends that there is no criminal antecedent against the accused-applicants, therefore, the accused-applicants be enlarged on bail. 4. On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail applications. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record. 6. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the facts that the accused-applicants namely; Munfed and Akram are behind the bars for the last more than six months and accused-applicant-Taslim is behind the bars for the last more than three months; that there is no criminal antecedent against the accused-applicants; that the charge-sheet has already been filed [2025:RJ-JP:23868] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-847/2025] and trial will take long time to conclude, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow the bail application filed by the accused- applicants. 7. Consequently, these bail applications filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 are allowed. It is ordered that the accused- applicants namely; (1) Munfed S/o Taiyab, (2) Akram S/o Fatti & (3) Taslim S/o Janmohammad @ Janu arrested in FIR No. 279/2024 registered at Police Station Khoh, District Deeg shall be released on bail; provided each of them furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each and two solvent attested sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Applicants will be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. The accused-applicants are also directed to mark their presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned Police Station. SHO of the concerned Police Station shall send the presence report of the accused-applicants to learned trial Court every month. In case of any breach to the above condition, learned Deputy Government Advocate shall be free to move the application against the accused-applicants for cancellation of bail before concerned Magistrate. 9. Copy of this order also be sent to concerned SHO for compliance. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /27-28