IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVART APPEAL SUIT Nos: 13 & 76 OF 2023 APPEAL SUIT No: 13 OF 2023 Appeal filed under section 96 of CPC r/w Rule 49 of The A.P Agency aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dt.13-12-2022 in I.A.NO.01A/2022 in A.O.S.No.01/2022 Governrnent-cum-Agency District Judge, A.S.R.District, Paderu only to extent of ordering the petitioner/appellant/plaintiff to respondents/defendants for the land of Ac.0.01 Rules., on the file of the Agent to the the compensate the cent, which is in his possession by way of land, and till such time constructions shall not be done by the petitioner/appellant/plaintiff on the suit land (in A.O.S No. 1/2022), Between: Kimudu Leela Prasad, S/o Late.Kimudu Sanyasi Naidu, aged 51 years Paderu Village, Paderu Mandal, Alluri Sitharama Raju District. ...Appellant/Plaintiff AND 1. Kottagulli Kotibabu, S/o Late. Binju Babu, R/o Gudivada Village, Paderu Mandal, Alluri Sitharama Raju District. Paderu. 2. Kottagulli Bharat Naidu, S/o Late. Biniju Babu, R/o Gudivada Village, Paderu Mandal, Alluri Sitharama Raju District. Paderu. ...Defendants/Respondents lA No: 2 of 2023 Petition under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 of CPC circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant temporary injunction against the respondents praying that in the from interfering with the petitioner making further construction of floor, first floor and second floor and construction of compound wall in the suit land by keeping the excess land of Ac.0.01 cent vacant till within the boundaries namely East; Neelatarevudaari, south: Block Road, West: thamarbha Apparao Naidu House, North: Defendant's land the disposal of the appeal. lA No: 1 of 2025 in IA.No.2 of 2023: Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive additional documents of the petitioner to file the sketch and endorsement dt. 15-02-2025 as part of the record in I.A.No.2 of 2023 in A.S.No. 13/2023 now pending on the file of this Hon'ble Court. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Surepalll Madhava Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Bolla Venkata Rama Rao APPEAL SUIT No: 76 of 2023 Appeal filed under section 96 of CPC r/w Rule 49 of The A.P Agency Rules., aggrieved by the Judgment and Decree dt. 13-12-2022 in A.O.S No. 03/2022 on the file of the Hon'ble Court of Agent to the Government Agency District Judge, A.S.R. District, Paderu only to the extent of ordering the appellant to compensate the respondents/defendants for the Ac.0.1 1/2 cents, which is in his possession by way of land. Between: Tamaraba Apparao, S/o (late) Balana, Aged about 69 Village, Paderu Mandal. Alluri Sitharama Raju District. Andhra Pradesh Appellant/Plaintiff ground -cum- land of years, R/o Paderu ■ ■■ AND 1. Kothagulli Kotibabu, S/o (Late) Bonju Babu 2. Kottagulli Bharat Naidu, S/o (late) Bonju Babu, (Both respondents/defendants are the residents of Gudivada Village. Paderu Mandal, Alluri Sitharama Raju District. 1 ...RESPONDENTS/DEFENDENTS lA No: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Order 41 Rule 5 r/w 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the execution of the Judgment and Decree dated 13-12-2022 in A.O.S No. 03/2022 on the file of the Hon'ble Court of Agent to-the Gavernment-cum-Agency District Judge, A.S.R. District Paderu only to the extent of ordering the appellant to compensate the respondents/defendants for the land of Ac.0.1 14 cents, which is in his possession by way of land. Counsel for the Appellant: SRI SUREPALLI MADHAVA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: SRI BOLLA VENKATA RAMA RAO The Court made the following: A.S.13&76 OF 2023 Dt; 10.04.2025 BVLNC.J APHC010714382022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) SMS [3368] 7\ THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI FIRST APPEAL NO: 13/2023 Between: 1.KIMUDU LEELA PRASAD, S/0 LATE.KIMUDU SANYASl NAIDU AGED 51 YEARS, PADERU VILLAGE ALLURI SITHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT. PADERU MANDAL ...APPELLANT AND S/0 LATE. BINJU BABU,R/0 GUDIVADA VILLAGE, PADERU MANDAL, ALLURI SITHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT. PADERU. 1. KOTTAGULLI KOTIBABU R/0 2.KOTTAGULLI BHARAT NAIDU, S/0 LATE. BINIJU BABU GUDIVADA VILLAGE, PADERU MANDAL, ALLURI SITHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT. PADERU. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant: 1.SUREPALLI MADHAVA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. BOLLA VENKATA RAMA RAO A.S.13&76 0F 2023 Dt: 10.04.2025 BVLNC.J APHC010096772023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] Eli? THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI FIRST APPEAL NO: 76/2023 Between: 1.TAMARABA APPARAO, S/0 (LATE) BALANA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/0 PADERU VILLAGE, PADERU MANDAL. ALLURI SITHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH ...APPELLANT AND 1.KOTHAGULLI KOTIBABU, , S/0 (LATE) BONJU BABU 2.KOTTAGULLI BHARAT NAIDU, S/0 (LATE) BONJU BABU, (BOTH RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS ARE THE RESIDENTS OF GUDIVADA VILLAGE. PADERU MANDAL, ALLURI SITHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT.1 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant: 1 .SUREPALLI MADHAVA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.BOLLA VENKATA RAMA RAO The Court made the following: A.S.13&76 OF 2023 Dt: 10.04.2025 BVLNC.J THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT Nos.13 & 76 OF 2023 COMMON JUDGMENT: The Appeal Suits came to be filed by the appellant/plaintiff under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, r/w. Rule 49 of the Andhra Pradesh Agency Rules, 1954, challenging the common judgment and decrees, dated 13.12.2022, on the file of Agent to the Court-cum-Agency District Judge, A.S.R.District, Paderu, passed in I.A.No.01 A/2022 in A.O.S.No.01 of 2022 and A.O.S.No.03 of 2022. Heard Sri Surepalli Madhava Rao, learned counsel for the Appellant/Plaintiff and Sri Bolla Venkata Rama Rao, learned counsel for the Respondents/Defendants. Perused the material on record. 02. The parties in these Appeal Suits shall hereinafter be referred to as arraigned in the A.O.S. for convenience and clarity. 03. 04. The learned counsel for the appellants/plaintiffs and respondents/defendants would admit that the impugned common judgment under challenge was rendered, while considering the A.O.S.No.01/2022 and interlocutory application No.01 A/2022 in A.O.S.No.03/2022 for Temporary Injunction. The learned Agent to the Government passed the common judgment, without following the BVLNC.J A.S.13& 76 OF 2023 Dt: 10.04.2025 procedure contemplated for trial of the suits in Andhra Pradesh Agency Rules, 1924. Therefore, the impugned common judgment and decrees of the learned Agent to the Government are not sustainable in law. 05. Both the suits were filed for declaration of title and permanent The plaintiff filed an interlocutory application vide in A.O.S.No.01/2022. The learned Agent to the Government while enquiring into the said application, disposed of both the suits by delivering the impugned common judgment. injunction. I.A.No.OIA/2022 06. The learned counsel for plaintiffs and defendants would submit that the Andhra Pradesh Agency Rules, 1924 will apply for institution, trial and determination of suits filed before the Agent to the Government. It is an admitted fact that both the suits were instituted before the learned Agent to the Government under the Rules of Andhra Pradesh Agency Rules, 1924. Rules 14 to 28 of the Andhra Pradesh Agency Rules, 1924 deal with the institution, trial and determination of the suits coming before the Agent to the Government. 07. Rule 15 speaks that “except where otherwise provided in the Rules, the trial of civil suits shall be conducted by the Courts by receiving written statements, and when the parties are at issue of question on some law or fact, may proceed to determine such issue or A.S.13&76OF2023 Dt: 10.04.2025 BVLNC.J issues, on receiving evidence and examination of witnesses, and later. pronouncement of judgment. Both the counsel would admit that the learned Agent to the 08. Government did not follow the above procedure before delivering the impugned common judgment. They sought for remand of the matter to the trial Court for fresh consideration as per law. The foregoing facts and circumstances discussed would disclose that the learned Agent to the Government did not follow the procedure contemplated for institution, trial and determination of the suits laid down in Andhra Pradesh Agency Rules, 1924, and rendered the impugned common judgment, while enquiring into an interlocutory application. Such a practice adopted by the learned Agent to the Government is 09. unknown to law and shocks the consciousness of this Court. It appears that the learned Agent to the Government is not aware of about the procedure contemplated for institution, trial and determination of the suits in Andhra Pradesh Agency Rules, 1924. Therefore, he disposed of the suits by rendering the impugned common judgment, while enquiring into an interlocutory application, causing prejudice to the rights of both parties. BVLNC.J A.S.13& 76 0F 2023 Dt: 10.04.2025 10. In the light of foregoing discussion, this Court is of the considered opinion that the impugned judgment rendered by the Agent Government is liable to be set aside and both the suits Agent to the Government Court for fresh disposal laid down in Andhra Pradesh Agency Rules, 1924. to the be remitted to the as per the procedure 11. In the result, both the Appeal Suits i.e., A.S.No. 13/2023 and 76/2023 are allowed, by setting aside the decrees dated common judgment and 13.12.2022 passed in A.O.S.No.01/2022 and A.O.S.No.03/2022. remitted to the Court of Agent to the Government-cum-Agency District Court, ASR District, Paderu, with a direction to dispose of both the suits I.A.No.OIA/2022 and Both the matters are per the procedure contemplated in Andhra Pradesh Agency Rules 1924, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within as a period of six (06) months, from the date of receipt of copy of this common judgment. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. BVLNC.J A.S.13&76 OF 2023 Dt: 10.04.2025 The Registry is directed to send the trial Court record forthwith the Court of Agent to the Government-cum-Agency District Court, ASR District, Paderu. to Sd/- V. SATYANARAYANA DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Court of Agent to-the Government-cum-Agency District Judge, A.S.R. District Paderu, Visakhapatnam District, (with records if any) 2. One CC to Sri Surepalli Madhava Rao Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri Bolla Venkata Rama Rao Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati. (with records) 5. Three CD Copies. SAM HIGH COURT SAM DATED;10/04/2025 COMMON JUDGMENT AS.Nos.13&76of2023 ^ \ (1 APR W* ^OESPATCJS^ ALLOWING THE APPEAL SUITS WITHOUT COSTS