Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38370 (RAJ)

PRIYANKA MEENA D/O SH. MANGI LAL MEENA BY CASTE MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

CW/19624/2018 · 2025-11-12

Ganesh Ram Meena

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:45536] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19624/2018 Priyanka Meena D/o Sh. Mangi Lal Meena By Caste Meena, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Kiratpura, Teh. Sapotra, Distt. Karauli (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Deptt., Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19271/2018 1. Varsha Yadav D/o Murari Lal, Aged About 23 Years, R/o 842-B, Shrinath Puram, Kota, Rajasthan. 2. Dropdi Mehra D/o Mathura Lal Mehra, Aged About 25 Years, R/o H. No. 535, Keshavpura, Sector-7, Kota, Rajasthan. 3. Namita Sharma D/o Shanti Lal Sharma, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Padmani Place, Dr. Mukharjee Nagar, Opposite Thana, Bhawani Mandi, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan. 4. Aishwarya Sharma D/o Shanti Lal Sharma, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Padmani Place, Dr. Mukharjee Nagar, Opposite Thana, Bhawani Mandi, District Jhalawar, Rajasthan. 5. Shabana Bano D/o Abdul Salim, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Vpo Kundera, Tehsil And District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. 6. Naresh Sharma S/o Uttam Chand Sharma, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Plot No. 118, Ashok Vihar, A, Diggi Road, Sanganer, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Education Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Primary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. [2025:RJ-JP:45536] (2 of 3) [CW-19624/2018] ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19429/2018 1. Mukesh Kumar Balai S/o Chatra Ram Balai, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Thoriya, Post Gajpur, Tehsil Kumbhalgarh, District Rajsamand, Rajasthan. 2. Kamlesh Choudhary D/o Bhanwar Lal Choudhary, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Rustamganj, Post Chandlai, Tehsil And District Tonk, Rajasthan. 3. Mamta Meena D/o Ramratan, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village And Post Gumanpura, Tehsil And District Bundi, Rajasthan. 4. Khaturam Pargi S/o Virji Pargi, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Vpo Dhangaon, Tehsil Chikhli, Via Chikhli, District Dungarpur, Rajasthan. 5. Pooja Jindal D/o Laxminarayan Gupta, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village And Post Pareeta, Tehsil Karauli, Rajasthan. 6. Priya Agrawal D/o Gopal Lal Gupta, Aged About 22 Years, R/o In Front Of Nehru Park, Near Mahesh Talkij, Gangapurcity, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Education Secretary, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Primary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.P. Saini Mr. Amir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 12/11/2025 1. At the outset, it has been brought to the notice of this Court that the controversy involved in these petitions has already been [2025:RJ-JP:45536] (3 of 3) [CW-19624/2018] decided by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Trilok Ram Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. while deciding D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 667/2015. It has also been brought to the notice of this Court that subsequently the Special Leave Petition filed against the case of Trilok Ram (Supra) has already been allowed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of The State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Trilok Ram, reported in (2019) 10 SCC 383. 2. Since, the controversy involved in these petitions has already been set at rest by the Hon’ble Apex Court, while deciding the Special Leave to Petition filed by the State, hence this Court finds no valid reason to take a different view. 3. In view of the above, the present writ petitions stand dismissed in the terms of the observations made in the case of The State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Trilok Ram. 4. Stay application and all pending application/s, if any, also stand/s dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /144-146