Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:2847] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3rd Bail Application No. 880/2025 Khurshid S/o Shri Bhartu, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Chandupura, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Sewar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 881/2025 Sajid S/o Shri Aalam, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Peelsoo, Police Station Gopalgarh, District Deeg (At Present Confined In Central Jail Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 20/01/2025
1. These two bail applications were preferred on behalf of petitioners- Khurshid and Sajid in a matter arising out of FIR no. 99/2024 dated 12.06.2024 registered at P.S. Gopalgarh, District Deeg wherein after filing of charge-sheet both the accused were charged under Sections 419, 420, 384, 467, 468, 471, 411, 120-B IPC and Section 66-D of IT Act.
[2025:RJ-JP:2847] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-880/2025]
2.
Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and they were falsely implicated by police. He submits that on last occasion, bail of Khurshid was dismissed on 24.10.2024 whereas bail of Sajid was dismissed on 05.08.2024. He further submits that after dismissal of bail application by this Hon’ble Court, the trial court has framed the charges and now the petitioners are facing trial before the trial court. He also submits that the petitioners are sole breadearners of their families and the disposal of the case will take its own time. At last, he submitted that the petitioners accused assures the Hon’ble Court that they will not repeat their crime or indulge in any of the cyber criminal activity. He further submits that they are ready to abide by any condition imposed by this Hon’ble Court. 3. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 4. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 5. On 11.06.2024 during operation 5-6 persons with mobile were intercepted and on enquiry the police has found that they were involved in cyber criminal activity including cyber bulling, sextortion and digital fraud etc. After the proceedings FIR no. 99/2024 was registered at P.S. Gopalgarh, District Deeg and after enquiry a charge-sheet was has been filed against both the petitioners. The petitioners were already charged by learned trial court on 03.12.2024. The bail application was dismissed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kaman on 24.12.2024. 6. A perusal of reasons assigned in order dated 05.08.2024 in bail application no. 7929/2024 and order dated 24.10.2024 in bail
[2025:RJ-JP:2847] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-880/2025] application no. 13175/2024 clearly indicates that the petitioners were involved in cyber criminal activity such as cheating, sextortion, cyber bulling. For last few year, District Deeg and Kaman area of Bharatpur came on the map of cyber criminal activities. A large number of cyber criminal activities were committed as criminals residing in these areas and victims across the country. 7. After dismissal of last bail application only charge has been framed and no evidence has been recorded so far, therefore, looking to gravity of the matter, particularly chances of recurrence of involvement in same criminal activity after release on bail, I am not inclined to grant bail to these two petitioners. The trial court is expected to expedite the trial. 8.
In view of aforesaid, the bail applications preferred by Khurshid and Sajid are hereby dismissed. The trial court is
directed to expedite the trial and make all endeavour to dispose of the criminal case as early as possible.
9. Office is directed to send a copy by e-mail to the trial court.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /4-5