Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38356 (PNJ)

AMARJIT KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/1673/1998 · 2025-07-31

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

104 AMARJIT KAUR STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) been decided during the pendency of the present petition, which order needs to be challenged hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh one on the s which is also causing prejudice to 31-07-2025 Sapna Goyal NOTE: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1673 Date of Decision : 31 AMARJIT KAUR VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Mr. Dharamjeet Singh Sangar, for the petitioner. Mr. T.P.S Chawla, Sr. DAG Punjab. *** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as been decided during the pendency of the present petition, which order needs to be challenged hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh one on the same cause of action by challenging the order in appeal, which is also causing prejudice to her. Ordered accordingly. Pending application, if any, also stand 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) NOTE: Whether speaking: YES Whether reportable: NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1673-1998 (O&M) Date of Decision : 31-07-2025 ........Petitioner VERSUS ........Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Dharamjeet Singh Sangar, Advocate T.P.S Chawla, Sr. DAG Punjab. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as appeal has been decided during the pendency of the present petition, which order needs to be challenged hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty to the petitioner to file a ame cause of action by challenging the order in appeal, , if any, also stands disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE : YES NO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI appeal has been decided during the pendency of the present petition, which order needs to be challenged hence, the present petition may kindly be disposed of as having been not pressed any further with liberty to the petitioner to file a ame cause of action by challenging the order in appeal, (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) SAPNA GOYAL 2025.07.31 18:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document