[2025:RJ-JP:50218] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15773/2025 Bablu S/o Gainda, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Indra Colony, Kaman, Presently R/o Bhojan Thali, Kaman, Police Station Kaman, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16225/2025 Roki Son Of Mohana Alias Mohan, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Lala Mohalla, Kama, Police Station Kama, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, P.P. with Ms. Arti Sharma, Dy. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI Order 10/12/2025 The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioners in the matter arising out of F.I.R. No.488/2025, registered at Police Station Kaman, District Deeg for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 305(a) & 331(4) of B.N.S. [2025:RJ-JP:50218] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15773/2025] Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case, they have nothing to do with the alleged offence(s) and they are behind the bars since 30.10.2025. Counsel further submit that although the incident occurred on 14.09.2025, the F.I.R. was lodged on 28.09.2025 and no explanation has been furnished for the delay in lodging the FIR. The case is triable by a Court of Magistrate. Trial/investigation of the case is likely to take a long time to conclude, till then, their further incarceration would not serve any fruitful purpose and they are ready and willing to furnish their bail bonds. Therefore, the bail applications deserve to be allowed. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material made available on record. Taking into consideration the submissions put forth and overall facts & circumstances of the case but without commenting upon detailed merits of the case, this Court deems it fit to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. Therefore, the bail applications are allowed. Accused- petitioners, namely Bablu S/o Gainda & Roki Son Of Mohana Alias Mohan, shall be released on bail, if they are not required in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five Thousand) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any other Court to which [2025:RJ-JP:50218] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15773/2025] the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when they are called upon to do so. (VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /340-341