Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38348 (BOM)

TAHER AHEMAD MOHAMMDGOUS KAPATHAL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

WP/3769/2021 · 2025-04-01

Shri S M Modak, Shri Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

23-WP-3769-2021.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3769 OF 2021 TaherAhemad MohammdGous Kapathal ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents ***** Mr.S.S.Borulkar i/b. Mr.Manoj A. Patil – Advocate for Petitioner. Mr.S.V.Gavand – APP for Respondent No.1 – State. ***** CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & S.M.MODAK, JJ. DATE : 1st APRIL 2025 P.C. : 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Petition with liberty to prefer an Application for discharge before the trial Court. 2. Permission is granted. The Petition is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty. The Petitioner is at liberty to prefer an Application for discharge before the trial Court. 3. If, such an Application is preferred, it shall be decided on its own merits, and in accordance with law, without being influenced by withdrawal of this Petition. Satish Sangar 1 of 2 SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Digitally signed by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2025.04.03 10:14:36 +0530 23-WP-3769-2021.odt 4. All the questions raised in this Writ Petition are left open. (S.M.MODAK, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Satish Sangar 2 of 2