Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38346 (JHR)

MD TAUSIF ANSARI ALIAS TOSIF ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./5496/2025 · 2025-10-31

Rajesh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:32787 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A No.5496 of 2025 Md. Tausif Ansari @ Tosif Ansari, aged about 26 years, S/o Khalil Ansari, R/o Hurlung, P.O.- Hurlung, P.S. - Chatro Chatti Dist.- Bokaro (Jharkhand) …… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Jaibun Nisha, Wife of Tausif Ansari @ Tausik Ansari, aged about 25 years, Daughter of Salamat Ansari, Resident of Village – Kargalo, P.O + P.S. - Bishnugarh, Dist. - Hazaribag. ….. Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Razaullah Ansari, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Priya Shrestha, Spl.P.P --------- 04/Dated: 31 st October, 2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State. 2. Apprehending his arrest, the applicant has renewed his prayer for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail, in connection with Bishnugarh Case No.181 of 2022, registered for the offence under Section 341/ 323/ 354(B)/ 366/ 371/ 498-A/ 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the court of J.M., 1st Class, Hazaribag. 3. From perusal of record, it appears that earlier considering the nature of allegation, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the applicant has been rejected vide order dated 09.01.2024, passed in A.B.A No.9530 of 2023. It is his second attempt. 4. It further appears from the order of the court below that the applicant-husband is not cooperative. 5. Considering the above fact, I am not inclined to reconsider the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is hereby, rejected once again. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 31st October, 2025 Ravi-Chandan/- Uploaded on 03.11.2025