APHC010709622011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15435/2011 Between: 1. M. HIMA BINDU, ANANTAPUR DIST, W/O. SURYANARAYANA REDDY GUNDUVARIPALLI VILLAGE, AMADAGUR MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. CHAIRMAN HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORP LTD MUMBAI 5 OTHERS, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN 17, JAMSHEDJI TATA RAOD, MUMBAI 400 020 2. THE ZONAL MANAGER, HINDUSTAN PETROLIUM CORPORATION LTD, SOUTH CENTRAL ZONE, HPCL, 111, CHANDRALOK COMPLEX, 1ST FLOOR, OPP. PARADISE HOTEL, SAROJINI DEVI ROAD, 3. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, HINDUSTAN PETROLIUM CORPORATION LTD, REGIONAL OFFICE, KADAPA 4. THE INVESTIGATION OFFICER/ CHIEF MANAGER ENGINEERING, HINDUSTAN PETROLIUM CORPORATION LTD, SOUTH CENTRAL ZONE, HPCL, 111, CHANDRALOK COMPLEX, 1ST FLOOR, OPP. PARADISE HOTEL, SAROJINI DEVI ROAD, 5. DEVARA VAMSI KRISHNA, S/O. D. MALLIKARJUNA NAIDU KAMMAVARIPALLI H/O. CHINNAGARIPALLI AMADAGURU MANDAL, ANANATPAUR DISTRICT 6. P JAYABHARATA REDDY, S/O. SRI RAMACHANDRA REDDY R/O. SADDALAVARIPALLE VILLAGE, AMADAGURU MANDAL, ANANATPAUR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the results/merits panel displayed by 3rd respondent on 5.1.2011 and revised merit panel announced by 2nd respondent on 20.5.2011 for appointment of New Retail Outlet Dealer, Amadagur Village Outlet, Anantapur District as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to stated selection procedure and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to consider appointment of petitioner as New Retail Outlet Dealer, Amadagur Village Outlet, Anantpur District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 18507 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents not to allow New Retail Outlet dealership, Amadagur village, Outlet Anantapur District which was shown as item No. 596 in the advertisement dt. 6.9.2010 pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2011(WPMP 18508 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the Results / Merit Panel displayed by Respondents on 5.1.2011 and 20.5.2011 for appointment of New Retail Outlet dealership, Amadagur village, Outlet Anantapur District in the interest of justice pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WVMP 192031 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WVMP 879 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim orders passed in WPMP No. 18507 of 2011 in W.P.No. 15435 of 2011 dated 09.06.2011 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V B SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M RAVINDRANATH REDDY 2. K RATHANGA PANI REDDY 3. M SURENDER RAO 4. The Court made the following ORDER: No representation for the petitioner. On the earlier occasion also i.e., on 11.08.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 01.09.2025, under the caption “for dismissal”. On 01.09.2025 also there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the same caption. Even today there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 08.09.2025 KAS