- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14450-DB CCC No. 100209 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B. CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 100209 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. KASTURI W/O. RAMANGOUDA HONNAPPANAVAR AGE. 56 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, 2. RUDRASARJA @ RUDRAGOUDA S/O. RAMANGOUDA HONNAPPANAVAR AGE. 33 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, 3. SHANKAR @ SHANKARGOUDA S/O. RAMANGOUD HONNAPPANAVAR AGE. 32 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURIST, ALL ARE R/O. MARIHAL, TQ. BAILHONGAL, DIST. BELAGAVI 591102. …COMPLAINANTS (BY SMT. SOUBHAGYA S. VAKKUND, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DIVYA PRABHU, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DHARWAD, DIST. DHARWAD 580007. 2. SHALEM HUSEN, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DHARWAD, SUB DIVISION, DHARWAD 580007. 3. PRAKASH HODEPPEGOL, THE TASHILDAR, HUBBALLI TALUKA, DIST. DHARWAD 580007. …ACCUSED 4. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, A.G. OFFICE, DHARWAD-580011. …PROFORMA RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA) VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14450-DB CCC No. 100209 of 2025 THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, R/W. ARTICLE 215 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA,1950, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED PERSONS REGARDING THE DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN WRIT PETITION 101033/2024 DATED 12.06.2024 & ETC. THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B. ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT) This contempt petition is filed under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India alleging the disobedience of order dated 12.06.2024 passed in WP No.101033/2024, whereunder this Court passed the following order: i) The petition is allowed. ii) The writ of mandamus is issued to respondents No.2 and 3 to consider the representation dated 25.07.2023 and enter the names of the petitioners in the record of rights based on the registered sale deed with respect to RS No.163(1) the same shall be done within an outer limit of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the order. 3. Today, an affidavit of present Tahsildar, Dharwad dated 28.10.2025 is filed enclosing three documents viz. office - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:14450-DB CCC No. 100209 of 2025 orders, communication dated 14.10.2025, RTC and mutation in respect of Sy.No.163/1 of Madanabavi village. It is seen that in terms of order of learned Single Judge, the names of the complainants are entered in the RTC based on the sale deed in respect of the land in question. 4. On going through the affidavit as well as the documents enclosed to the affidavit, we are satisfied that there is substantial compliance with the direction issued by this Court. Learned counsel Smt. Soubhagya Vakkund for the complainants also submits that there is compliance with the order of the learned Single Judge. 5. In view of the above, further proceedings are dropped. Sd/- (S G PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (GEETHA K.B.) JUDGE JTR CT:VP