Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38341 (HP)

SANSAR CHAND AND OTHERS v. PARSHOTAM AND ANOTHER

CMP.M/880/2018 · 2025-11-27

Bipin Chander Negi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Sansar Chand Vs. Parshotam And Ors. CMP(M) No. 880 of 2018 27.11.2025 Present: Mr. Vikrant Chandel, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Respondent No.1 is proceed ex-parte. Mr. Vinod Kumar Soni, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Nikhil, Advocate, vice Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate for respondents No.3, 5 and 6. . Respondent No.4 stands deleted vide order dated 06.06.2025 passed in CMP No.21267 of 2024. CMP(M) No. 880 of 2018 No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the contesting respondents. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the application. For the sufficient cause shown delay of 59 days in filing of the present appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. RSA No._________ of 2025 Be registered. List after two weeks. CMP No.________ of 2025 Be registered. (Bipin C. Negi) 27th November, 2025 Judge Kiran