Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38340 (RAJ)

PHOOL SINGH SON OF SHRI PRATHI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

HC/103/2025 · 2025-05-02

Inderjeet Singh, Mukesh Rajpurohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18639-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 103/2025 Phool Singh son of Shri Prathi, aged about 50 Years, R/o Sajanpur, Tehsil Chhipabarod, District Baran (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Superintendent of Police, Baran. 3. Station House Officer, P.S. Harnawadashahji, District Baran (Raj). 4. The Additional Director General of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur 5. Dinesh Banjara Son of Gorilal, R/o Village Patadi, P.S. Harnawadashahji, District Baran (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abdul Kalam Khan For Respondent(s) : MR. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG Mr. Sudesh Saini, Addl. GA Mr. Brijesh Singh, SHO, Police Station Harnawadashahji, District Baran HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT Order 02/05/2025 1. Heard. 2. The corpus, on having been recovered, has been produced today before this Court by Mr. Brijesh Singh, SHO, Police Station Harnawadashahji, District Baran. The date of birth of the corpus is below 18 years of age, which is affirmed by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned GA-cum-AAG. [2025:RJ-JP:18639-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-103/2025] 3. We have interacted with the corpus and she has stated before this Court that she wants to go and live with the petitioner (her father). 4. The corpus is permitted to go with the petitioner (her father). The concerned Police Officer is directed to hand over the custody of the corpus to the petitioner (her father). 5. In that view of the matter, the present habeas corpus petition stands disposed of. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J GARIMA /1