[2025:RJ-JP:39073] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 1487/2025 1. Mukesh Singh Son Of Shri Sattu Singh, Resident Of Liwari Police Station Sadar District Alwar (Raj) (At Present Are Confined In District Jail, Alwar) 2. Amit Singh @ Bittu Son Of Shri Sattu Singh, Resident Of Liwari Police Station Sadar District Alwar (Raj) (At Present Are Confined In District Jail, Alwar) 3. Prakash Singh Son Of Shri Sattu Singh, Resident Of Liwari Police Station Sadar District Alwar (Raj) (At Present Are Confined In District Jail, Alwar) ----Appellants Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Pawan Kumar Verma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 23/09/2025 1. The appellants have been convicted by the learned Additional Session Judge, No.3, Alwar, vide judgment dated 14.07.2025 in Sessions Case No.18/2017. Accused-appellants-Mukesh Singh, Amit Singh @ Bittu and Prakash Singh for the offences under Section 341 of IPC and sentenced for one month simple imprisonment, under Section 323 of IPC, six months simple imprisonment, under Section 324 of IPC, one year simple imprisonment, under Section 307/34 of IPC, ten years simple imprisonment and accused-appellant-Mukesh Singh for offence [2025:RJ-JP:39073] (2 of 3) [SOSA-1487/2025] under Section 4/25 of Arms Act, two years simple imprisonment respectively with default stipulation. 2. Being aggrieved the appellants have preferred this appeal. Pending disposal of the appeal, by way of present application under Section 430 of BNSS, 2023 the appellants seeks suspension of sentence and release on bail. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellants have submitted that no specific act was attributed to the present appellants. The injury caused to injured necessary for Section 307 of IPC is attributed to another co-accused-Sattu Singh. Though there is allegation against the present-appellants to attack with sharp weapon but as per the injury reports, the injury caused to the injured-Anil and Ramesh are simple in nature. There is a cross case of the same incident in which four injuries were caused to the appellant-Mukesh. Appellant as well as the injured person belong to same family. The appellants are behind the bars since two and half months. The hearing of the appeal is not likely to be concluded in near future. Therefore, the application for suspension of sentence may be allowed. 4. The learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the application for suspension of sentence. 5. I have heard the contentions of the learned counsel for the appellants and learned Public Prosecutor on the application for suspension of sentence and perused the material available on record. 6. Taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances of the case, and the fact that disposal of the appeal is likely to take considerable time but without expressing any opinion on merits of [2025:RJ-JP:39073] (3 of 3) [SOSA-1487/2025] the case, I am inclined to suspend the sentence of the appellants- Mukesh Singh Son Of Shri Sattu Singh, Amit Singh @ Bittu Son Of Shri Sattu Singh and Prakash Singh Son Of Shri Sattu Singh. 7. It is, therefore, ordered that the sentence of the appellants shall remain suspended till disposal of the appeal and they shall be released on bail, provided they furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each of them, to the satisfaction of the trial Court to the effect that they shall appear before this Court on 29.10.2025 and as and when called upon to do so. 8. The application is accordingly disposed of. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/18