BALU RAM AND ORS v. BOARD OF REVENUE AJMER AND ORS
CW/9872/2002 · 2025-10-08
Ashutosh Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38332 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38332 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:40936] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9872/2002
1. Balu Ram Son of Shri Prabhu Lal, Resident of Birdhol, Tehsil Kotadi, Distt. Bhilwara (Rajasthan).
2. Chhau Bai W/o Shri Balu Ram, Resident of Birdhol, Tehsil Kotadi, Distt. Bhilwara (Rajasthan).
3. Durga Shankar Son of Shri Balu Ram, Resident of Birdhol, Tehsil Kotadi, Distt. Bhilwara (Rajasthan).
4. Ram Gopal Son of Shri Balu Ram, Resident of Birdhol, Tehsil Kotadi, Distt. Bhilwara (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus
1. Board of Revenue For Rajasthan Ajmer Through Its Registrar.
2. Revenue Appellate Authority, Bhilwara.
3. A.C.M. Mandalgarh Distt. Bhilwara. (Rajasthan).
4. Balu Son of Chhoga, Resident Village Piplaj, Tehsil Kotadi, Distt. Bhilwara (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : None present HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order 08/10/2025
1. Today, no one appears on behalf of the both the parties. On last occasion i.e. 10.09.2025 also, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
2. It seems that the petitioners have lost their interest in the present petition.
3. In that view of the matter, this civil writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
[2025:RJ-JP:40936] (2 of 2) [CW-9872/2002]
4. Stay application & any pending application(s) also stand
disposed of.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J TANISHA /32