BIPLAB KUMAR CHOWDHURY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WPA/21037/2021 · 2025-09-24
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38331 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38331 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
24.09.2025 19 sdas
WPA 21037 of 2021
Biplab Kumar Chowdhury Vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Raja Saha Mr. S. Mukherjee ….. for the W.B. Information Commission
The petitioner is unrepresented. Learned Advocate representing the respondents submits that since the second appeal has been disposed of, the writ petition has become infructuous. The document as produced by Mr. Saha is taken on record. Since the present writ petition was preferred by the concerned respondents to dispose of the appeal preferred under Section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 and that appeal has since been disposed of, the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.)