Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3832 (AP)

BODDETI AMMAJI LAKSHMI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/1317/2025 · 2025-09-07

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010023212025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 1317/2025 Between: 1. BODDETI AMMAJI LAKSHMI, W/O. VENKATA RAMANA, AGED ABPTIT 40 YEARS, R/O. G-KPDUM VILLAGE, MAKAVARAPUPALEM MANDALAM, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY,DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, ANAKAPALLI, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT, MAKARAPALEM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. G KODURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, G. KORIDURU VILLAGE, MAKARAPALEM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. THE EXTENSION OFFICER PR AND RD, SABBAVARAM MANDALAM, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tobe pleased to issue a Writ Order or direction particularly, one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent ip issuing the impugned Show Cause Notice No. 72574/2024/B. 1 dated 30.12.2024 for termination from service as Sarpanch, G.Konduru Gram Panchayat without conducting any enquiry or considering the written explanation of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violation of the Petitioners fundamental rights as guaranteed under Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution bf India consequently set aside the impugned proceedings duly directing the respondents to consider the petitioners candidature for the job with all consequential benefits and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CKR ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. Yarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Zilla Praja Parishads,Mandal Praja Parishads and Gra HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA W.P.No.1317 of 2025 This Court made the following ORDER: During the pendency of this Writ Petition, pursuant to the show cause notice dated 30.12.2024, which was challenged herein, a final order came to be passed suspending the petitioner from the post of Sarpanch. Hence, the cause of action arising out of the show cause notice no longer survives, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 08.09.2025 krk HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA W.P.No.1317 of 2025 08.09.2025 krk 113