Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38319 (CAL)

UTTAM MONDAL @ UTTAM KUMAR MONDAL v. BIBHU GOEL

CPAN/1114/2019 · 2025-06-12

Amrita Sinha

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

12-06-2025 Item no.72 Subrata Bhattacharyya AR(C) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Civil Jurisdiction Appellate Side CPAN No.1114 of 2019 Uttam Mondal @ Uttam Kumar Mondal -vs- Bibhu Goel & Anr. arising out of WPA No.1354 of 2018 Mr. Biswarup Biswas Ms. Nupur Chaudhuri …for the petitioner Mr. Nilotpal Chatterjee …for the contemnor 1. Affidavit-in-opposition filed on behalf of the second alleged contemnor is taken on record. 2. Upon hearing the respective parties and on perusal of the documents, it does not appear that the order of this court has not been complied with. The petitioner may be aggrieved by the manner in which the compliance has been made. The same gives rise to a fresh cause of action. 3. The petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the same before the competent forum in accordance with law, if so advised. 4. The contempt application is thus disposed of. 5. All parties are to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. [Amrita Sinha, J] 2