MS RASHI IMPEX v. ADVISOR TO THE ADMINISTRATOR, UT CHANDIGARH & OTHERS
CWP/8410/2025 · 2025-05-12
Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38313 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38313 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr. No.127
CWP-8410-2025 Date of decision : 12.05.2025
M/s Rashi Impex
.…. Petitioner Versus Advisor to the Administrator, UT, Chandigarh
and others
..... Respondents
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI
Present : Mr.N.P.Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3- Commissioner, Excise & Taxation, Chandigarh, to take a decision on the representation dated 08.09.2024 (Annexure P-1), made by the petitioner.
2.
On the asking of the Court, Mr.Ajay Jagga, Additional Standing Counsel for UT, Chandigarh, appears on behalf of the respondents and submits that he has no objection if the above prayer is accepted.
3.
Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to take a decision on the representation dated 08.09.2024 (Annexure P-1), made by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order and after affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned, preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4.
Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioner and if the decision is not to the satisfaction of the petitioner, it would be at liberty to challenge the same, in accordance with law.
[DEEPAK SIBAL]
JUDGE
12.05.2025
[LAPITA BANERJI] shamsher
JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SHAMSHER SINGH 2025.05.13 19:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh