APHC010707562022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL Between: Bheemasetty Jaya Krishna State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. V HEMANTH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioner/ seeking quashment of the proceedings 2018 on the file of the V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam. 2. Heard Sri V. Hemanth Kumar Ms. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the respondent/ State. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10532 OF 2022 Bheemasetty Jaya Krishna ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: V HEMANTH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioner/ seeking quashment of the proceedings pending against them in C.C.No. the V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam. V. Hemanth Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3396] THURSDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioner/ A2, them in C.C.No.33 of the V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam. , learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the owner of the motor cycle bearing Registration No. AP 16 BY 9424 and as per contents of the complaint, the 2nd respondent herein is neither the eye witness nor present at the alleged scene of offence. In fact the vehicle belonging to the petitioner was no involved in the alleged accident and for no fault of him, he has been roped into the false case. Hence, the petition may be disposed of without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner, by dispensing the presence of the petitioner before the Trial Court. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. In that view, the Criminal petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to raise all the contentions before the Trial Court in their defence. The presence of the petitioner before the Trial Court is dispensed with unless his presence is specifically directed by the Trial Court. Stay granted by this Court shall stands vacated. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 30.01.2025 KK THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10532 OF 2022 30.01.2025 KK