RSA-3842- IN THE HIG 217 Food Corpor M/s Matu Ra CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP judgment an Judge, Ludh was allowed by the learne dated 03.02. second appe appearance application appellant-Co restored to co-ordinate on behalf o -1999 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o Corporation of India Versus atu Ram Lal Chand M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None for the appellant-Corporat Mr. Sukesh K. Jindal, Advocate I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Appellant-plaintiff/Coporation ent and decree dated 16.07.1998, pa Ludhiana, vide which the appeal filed llowed reversing the judgment and dec rned Additional Civil Judge (Senio The matter pertains to the year Perusal of the order-sheets re 03.02.2020 passed by a co-ordinate Be appeal was dismissed for non-pros rance on behalf of the appellant-Corp ation (CM-1928-C-2020) moved b Corporation, the present second d to its original number vide ord inate Bench of this Court. Today, ag f of the appellant-Corporation, d ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-3842-1999 (O&M) Date of Decision: 05.02.2025 .… Appellant .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA orporation. vocate for the respondent. ation is in second appeal against the , passed by the learned District al filed by the defendant-respondent nd decree dated 10.11.1994, passed (Senior Division), Ludhiana. year 1999. ets reveals that earlier vide order ate Bench of this Court, the present prosecution, on account of non- Corporation. Thereafter, upon an ed by learned counsel for the econd appeal was ordered to be de order dated 13.01.2023, by a ay, again there is no representation , despite the case having been t the trict dent ssed rder sent n an the be y a tion een RISHU KATARIA 2025.02.05 19:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-3842- called twice Corporation instant secon to dismiss th 05.02.2025 rishu -1999 (O&M) -2- twice. Therefore, it can safely be p ration or its counsel is not seriousl second appeal. Thus, this Court is lef iss the present second appeal for non Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable y be presumed that the appellant- eriously interested in pursuing the rt is left with no other option except or non-prosecution. any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No the cept RISHU KATARIA 2025.02.05 19:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.