Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38299 (AP)

Katragadda Rama Lakhsmi v. Chiravuri Subrahmanyam

AS/313/2011 · 2025-06-29

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A APHC010707582011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI y. MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT NO: 313 OF 2011 OQ Section 96 of C.P.C, against the judgment and decree i OS.No.339 of 2005, dated 29-4-2009 Judge, Eluru Between: Katragadda Rama Lakhsmi, W/o Rama Krishna Rao, Hindu, aged about 33 years, EWS 51 APHB Colony, Satrampadu, Eluru, Eluru Mandal West Godavari District in on the file of the Additional Senior Civil ...Petitioner AND 1. Chiravuri Subrahmanyam, S/o Sitaramayya, Hindu, aged about 53 years, R/o Pragadavaram, Chitalapudi Mandal, W.G.District. 2. Chirravuri Visalakshmi died, W/o Subrahmanyam (died) ...Respondents/Defendants Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s Bharadwaj Associates Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Y V Ravi Prasad The Court made the following: - none appeared 4 APHC010707582011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY.THE THIRTIETHDAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT NO: 313/2011 Between: 1.KATRAGADDA RAMA LAKHSMI, W/0 RAMA KRISHNA RAO EWS 51 APHB COLONY, SATRAMPADU, ELURU, ...APPELLANT AND 1.CHIRAVURI SUBRAHMANYAM, S/0 SITARAMAYYA R/0 PRAGADAVARAM W.G.DISTRICT. CHITALAPUDI MANDAL, 2.CHIRRAVURI VISALAKSHMI SUBRAHMANYAM. DIED W/0 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant: 1.M/S BHARADWAJ ASSOCIATES Counsel for the Respondent{S): 1. Y V RAVI PRASAD The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT No.313 OF 2011 JUDGMENT: None appeared for the appellant, though the matter is posted under the caption “for dismissal”. Earlier also, there was no representation for the appellant. 2. Learned counsel representing for the respondents is in attendance. 3. In that view of the matter, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall Stand closed. Sd/-M RAMESH BABU . deputy REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, Judge(Senior Division), Elum, West Godavari 1 The Additional Civil . S"rl. .«OPUC, One CC to Sri Y V Ravi Prasad Advocate [OPUC] _ . . 4. ?he Seotion Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravathi 5. Two CD Copies Stu NM »; ^4^ HIGH COURT DATED:30/06/2025 ORDER A.S No. 313/2011 ANDf^ a 11 SEF 2025 tTi S- Current section ir DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT FOR NON-PROSECUTION