2025:HHC:38775 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWPOA No.426 of 2019 Decided on: 17.11.2025 __________________________________________________________ Raj Kumar ...Petitioner Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting?. No For the petitioner: Ms. Reena Kumari, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Amit Kumar Chaudhary, Deputy Advocate General. Ranjan Sharma, Judge Ms. Reena Kumari, Advocate, appearing vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner, on Instructions, states that petitioner does not intend to continue with the present proceedings. [Statement Taken on Record]. 2. Prayer being innocuous is not opposed by Learned State Counsel also. 3. Taking into account the statement made by Learned Counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is closed. 2025:HHC:38775 - 2 - In aforesaid terms, the instant petition and all pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 17th November, 2025 [himani]