RAMPRAKASH S/O KALYAN PRASAD v. RAMSWAROOP @ PAPPU ADOPTED SON SH. RANJEETA
CFA/889/2024 · 2025-10-07
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38289 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38289 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:40530] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 889/2024 Ramprakash S/o Kalyan Prasad, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Police Chouki, Near Kailash Talkies, Gangapur City, Rajasthan. ----Appellant Versus
1. Ramswaroop @ Pappu Adopted Son Sh. Ranjeeta, aged about 50 Years, Choukidar Resident of Ward No-38, Near Rajkiya Mahavidhala, Gangapur City, Rajasthan.
2. Rajulal S/o Motilal, aged about 48 Years, Resident of Sanjay Colony, Gangapur City Rajasthan.
3. Amar Singh S/o Sukiram, aged about 38 Years, Resident of Village- Lahvad, Tehsil- Nadouti, District- Karoli, Rajasthan.
4. State of Rajasthan, through Tehsildar Land Holder Tehsil, Gangapur City.
5. Sub Registrar Tehsildar, Gangapur City and
6. State of Rajasthan through District Collector. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Dr. T.N. Sharma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 07/10/2025
1. Counsel for appellant states that the original suit has been decided finally before the trial Court, hence, in that view, the challenge to the order dated 13.05.2024, passed in Suit No.133/21(02/16) by the Additional District Judge No.2, Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur, dismissing the application of appellant- defendant under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, has become infructuous.
2. Accordingly, instant appeal is dismissed as rendered infructuous.
3. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /97