1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 18789 of 2025 Date of decision: 1 st December ,2025 Himachal Pradesh Waqf Board ...Petitioner. Versus Municipal Corporation, Shimla …Respondent. Corum Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner. Ms Heena Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr.Bhup Singh Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge (Oral) On 28th November, 2025 on request of learned counsel for petitioner, the matter was adjourned for today i.e. 1st December, 2025 , in following terms:- “28.11.2025…… After addressing the Court for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks adjournment to have complete instructions to address the issue of maintainability of petition in present form and to take appropriate steps for impleading necessary parties. As prayed, list on 1st December, 2025.” 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes 2 2 Today, Ms. Heena Chauhan, Advocate, appearing under instructions of learned original counsel Mr. Bhup Singh Thakur, Advocate, submits that she has instructions to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh appropriate petition on the same cause of action in accordance with law, if advised and desired so. 3 In view of above submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Vivek Singh Thakur), Judge. (Romesh Verma), Judge. 1st December, 2025 (MS)