Jamshed Ansari @ Jamshed Alam v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./76134/2025 · 2026-02-24
Rajiv Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3828 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3828 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76134 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2022 Thana- DUMARIAGHAT District- East Champaran ====================================================== Jamshed Ansari @ Jamshed Alam S/O Md. Makbool Ahmad @ Maqbul Ansari R/O Vill.- Jussaini, P.S.- Dumariya Ghat, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nafisuzzoha, Advocate : Mr. Md. Raghib Alam, Advocate For the State : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 3 24-02-2026 Heard Mr. Md. Raghib Alam, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP representing the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dumariyaghat P.S. Case No. 179 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 394 of the Indian Penal Code, lodged on 20.08.2022 by the informant Raju Kumar.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that on 19.08.2022 as he was moving from Gopalganj to Motihari on NH-27, four persons intercepted and tried to rob him or the belongings. Upon his opposition, he got knife blow on the back as also the thighs, they later took away the motorcycle and the mobile. This led to the F.I.R..
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76134 of 2025(3) dt.24-02-2026 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that F.I.R. is against unknown, he has no role to play in the matter, only because of criminal antecedent, implicated.
5. Learned APP on the other hand opposes the prayer submitting that his role has come in the case diary and co- accused Navin Kumar, who was arrested, gave his name.
6. Considering the submissions of the parties as also the paragraph no.3 which shows his criminal antecedent of the same nature, the matter is of the year 2022, in that background, no relief can be extended.
7. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected.
vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T