Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38276 (JHR)

RAJGURU YADAV ALIAS RAJGURU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./7428/2025 · 2025-12-22

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:38582 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No.7428 of 2025 Rajguru Yadav @ Rajguru aged about 20-year son of Deepak Yadav resident of village-Charadih Chowk, Koderma, P.O. & P.S.- Koderma, District- Koderma, Jharkhand. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party -------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Baleshwar Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Sushma Aind, APP ------ 2/22.12.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No. 95/2023, for the offence registered u/s 147, 148, 341, 325, 379, 504 and 506 of I.P.C., which is pending in the court of the learned A. C. J. M., Koderma. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is named in the FIR, however there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons. He also submits that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only to harass him due to prior enmity with the informant’ son. He also submits that the petitioner and the son of the informant are students of J.J. College, Telaiya. He next submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in Para 13 of the petition. He further submits that another co-accused, who is not named in the FIR, has been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.2974 of 2025. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegation of assault is there against the petitioner. 2025:JHHC:38582 2 5. Considering that the petitioner and informant’s son are students of J.J. College, Telaiya, the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in Para 13 of the petition and other co-accused has been granted anticipatory bail in aforesaid ABA, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to surrender before the learned Court within four weeks from the date of receipt of the order and on the event of his surrender / arrest, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount of each to the satisfaction of learned A. C. J. M., Koderma, in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No. 95/2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 7. This Anticipatory Bail Application is accordingly allowed and disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 22.12.2025 R.Kumar