IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 206 RSA-3829-1999 (O & M) Date of Decision:08.04.2025 GIAN CHAND ...APPELLANT VERSUS SHANTI DEVI AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present: None. *** SUVIR SEHGAL, J.(ORAL) 1. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Similar was the position on the previous two occasions. 2. As per office note, counsel for the appellant has been informed via email. It seems that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the appeal. 3. Dismissed for default in prosecution. 4. Pending applications are disposed off. 08.04.2025 (SUVIR SEHGAL) sheetal JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Sheetal 2025.04.09 09:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Chandigarh