Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38269 (AP)

Harijana Prajarogya and Paarishudda v. Government of A.P.

WP/33345/2014 · 2025-03-18

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010706872014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 33345 Between: Harijana Prajarogya And Paarishudda and Others Government Of A P and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KOWTURU PAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 2. VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 33345 OF 2014 Harijana Prajarogya And Paarishudda and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Government Of A P and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): KOWTURU PAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3460] TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 33345 OF 2014 The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the acceptance of tenders of the respondents 3 to 5 by resolution dated 30.09.2014 in respect of tender notification vide Rc.No.1490/2014/F1, dated 06.09.2014. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents represented that in the light of the subsequent developments and changed circumstances, the cause in the Writ Petition has been rendered infructuous and as such, no further orders are necessary in this Writ Petition. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition and other miscellaneous petitions, if any, are therefore dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 18.03.2025 KK