Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38266 (CHH)

AJAY DEVDA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/2404/2025 · 2025-07-31

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:37956 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2404 of 2025 Ajay Devda S/o Let Bhanwar Lal Ji Aged About 23 Years R/o Village/post Bilada Ward No.15 Near Ambedkar Chowk In Front Of Parshad Banshi Lal Chauhan Gali, P.S. Pichiyak, District-Jodhpur (Rajasthan) ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Tikarapara, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Non-applicant(s) For Applicant : None For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Amit Verma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 01.08.2025 1. This is an office reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 22.01.2025 passed in MCRC No. 8452 of 2024, while allowing the bail to the applicant, namely, Ajay Devda, had expressed its trust that the trial Court would make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. 3. The learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), Raipur District-Raipur KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 21.07.2025 has requested for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 4. It transpires from perusal of the PUD, that the case is currently at the stage of recording the statement of the accused. However, the accused, Ajay Devda, resident of State of Rajasthan, has remained absent, and due to his residence being outside the jurisdiction, the arrest warrant could not be executed. Therefore, it is respectfully requested that an additional period of approximately six months be granted to ensure execution of the arrest warrant, secure the presence of the accused, record his statement, and subsequently pronounce the judgment. 5. The request made by the learned trial Court, is allowed, however, instead of granting six months, this Court deems it appropriate to grant further 04 months time for concluding the trial from today. 6. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 7. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal