Smt. K.Hema Krishna v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/34066/2018 · 2025-04-16
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38266 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38266 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010705792018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 34066/2018 Between: Smt. K.Hema Krishna ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K UDAYA SRI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR EDUCATION (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“ .... to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ i) declare the action of the Respondents in not considering the case of the Petitioner for appointment to the post of Watchman in pursuance to Notification dated 15.01.2004 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 15 and 16 of Constitution of India ii) declare that the Petitioner is eligible for appointment to the post of Watchman under O C Women category in 5th Respondent School as per the report submitted by the Respondent in 2009 and consequently, direct the Respondents to consider the case of the Petitioner for appointment to the post of Watchman under OC Women in pursuance to Notification dated 15 01 2004.”
2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption
“For Dismissal”.
3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today.
2
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents is in attendance.
5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 34066 of 2018
16.04.2025
Mjl /*