Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38262 (PNJ)

MUNICIPALITY BHATINDA v. BHUSHAN KUMAR

RSA/973/1998 · 2025-08-18

Virinder Aggarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-:1:- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (203) RSA-973-1998 (O&M) Date of Decision:-18.08.2025 MUNICIPALITY BHATINDA AND ANOTHER … Appellants Versus BHUSHAN KUMAR ... Respondent **** CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present:- None for the appellants. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral) 1. As per office report, notice issued to the appellants received back duly served, but no one has come present to represent them. It seems that appellants are not interested in pursuing this appeal. 2. In view of the above and given the prevailing circumstances, there seems to be no justification to keep the appeal on the docket, indefinitely. Accordingly, the instant appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution with liberty to the appellants to revive the same, if have any grievance from this order, within a period of three months from today. 3. Since the main case has been decided, pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands also disposed of. ( VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 18.08.2025 JUDGE Gaurav Sorot Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No GAURAV SOROT 2025.08.19 09:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document