ASHOKREDDI S/O RANGAPPA MULIMANI v. PADDAWWA W/O HANAMAPPA MULIMANI
RSA/5534/2012 · 2025-10-08
C M Joshi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38260 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 38260 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD
DATED THIS 08th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI
RSA NO. 5534 OF 2012(PAR) BETWEEN:
1 .
ASHOKREDDI S/O RANGAPPA MULIMANI AGE: 41 YRS, OCC: AGRIL.,R/O BINKADAKATTI, TQ. and DIST: GADAG
2.
MALLAVVA W/O RANGAPPA MULIMANI AGE: 69 YRS, OCC:AGRIL.,R/O BINKADAKATTI, TQ. and DIST: GADAG
3.
DEVAMMA W/O HANAMARADDI GOVANNAVAR AGE: 51 YRS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD.,R/O BELLATTI, TQ.
SHIRAHATTI DIST: GADAG
4.
RATNAVVA W/O SHIVARADDI MAKALI AGE: 46 YRS, OCC:HOUSEHOLD.,R/O BELLATTI, TQ.
SHIRAHATTI DIST: GADAG
...APPELLANTS
(By Sri. : K L PATIL and S S BETURMATH,ADVOCATES)
AND 1 .
PADDAWWA W/O HANAMAPPA MULIMANI AGE: 76 YRS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,R/O BINKADAKATTI, TQ.
and DIST. GADAG 2 .
KAMALAWWA W/O MAHADEVARADDI MARADI AGE: 56 YRS, OCC HOUSEWIFE,R/O BELLATTI, TQ:
SHIRAHATTI,DIST: GADAG 3 .
RAVI S/O HANAMAPPA MULIMANI AGE: 46 YRS, OCC : PRIVATE WORK,R/O BINKADAKATTI, TQ. and DIST: GADAG
2 4 .
VENKARADDI S/O HANAMAPPA MULIMANI AGE: 41 YRS, OCC : AGRIL.,R/O BINKADAKATTI, TQ. and DIST: GADAG RESPONDENTS
( R1- "DECEASED") RSA FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., IS PRAYING THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.02.2012 PASSED BY THE FAST TRACK JUDGE, GADAG IN R.A . NO. 44/2006 SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) AND CJM GADAG IN O.S NO. 7/1999 DATED 08.09.2006.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING;
O R D E R A week’s time is granted to do the needful. If needful is not done within a week, the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench.
SD/- JUDGE Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 06.11.2025. Advocate for the appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this RSA No. 5534/2012 stand dismissed without further reference to the Bench as per the Court Order dated 08.10.2025.
BY ORDER OF THE COURT Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. T- By: -psl