Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38259 (MAD)

V.BALAJI v. INSPECTOR OF POLICE

CRL OP/9435/2022 · 2025-02-27

Sunder Mohan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.9435 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27.02.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl.O.P.No.9435 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.No.5505 of 2022 Dr.V.Balaji ... Petitioner Vs. The Inspector of Police, CCB, Team-4, EDF-II, Veppery, Chennai. ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code, pleased to direct the respondent Police to conduct the further investigation in C.C.No.9149 of 2017 pending on the file of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, CCB and CBCID cases at Egmore, Chennai by appreciating the facts submitted by the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.B.Dhamodaran For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Criminal Side) O R D E R This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondent to conduct the further investigation in C.C.No.9149 of 2017 pending on the file of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, CCB & CBCID cases at Egmore, Chennai 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.9435 of 2022 2. The main submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/de facto complainant is that certain vital documents which are in possession of the de facto complainant and in the Bank were not collected by the Investigating Officer, and that would establish the prosecution case against the bank officials. 3. Considering the fact that the alleged occurrence took place in the year 2013-14, this Court is of the view that instead of directing further investigation, the petitioner may be permitted to produce all the documents in his possession and assist the prosecution. Such documents, if any produced, may be marked in accordance with law. It is needless to say that if the trial Court finds from the evidence that any other person has to be summoned to face the trial, the trial Court may do so. 4. With the above observations, the Criminal Original Petition stands closed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 27.02.2025 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ham 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.9435 of 2022 To 1. The Metropolitan Magistrate for CCB & CBCID Cases, Egmore, Chennai. 2. The Inspector of Police, CCB, Team-4, EDF-II, Veppery, Chennai. 3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.9435 of 2022 SUNDER MOHAN.,J ham Crl.O.P.No.9435 of 2022 and Crl.M.P.No.5505 of 2022 27.02.2025 2/2 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis