IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2191-2024(O&M) Date of decision:24.04.2025 Anu Goyal ..Petitioner Versus Kirpal Singh ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Mr.Devinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Advocate for Mr. S.S.Sarwara, Advocate for the respondent ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.(ORAL) In a suit for recovery of amount on the basis of negotiable instrument, the trial court, while granting leave to defend to the petitioner has directed him to furnish surety bonds equivalent to the amount sought to be recovered. The petitioner claims that the court could not have passed such an order. In order to secure execution of the decree if any to be passed in favour of the plaintiff, the court has only ordered the defendant to furnish surety bonds. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, no ground to interfere is made out. Hence, dismissed. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. (ANIL KSHETARPAL) 24.04.2025 JUDGE rekha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Rekha Sihag 2025.04.25 12:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh