Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38248 (AP)

P.G. ANITHA, ANANTAPUR DIST. v. THE GOVT.OF A.P.,REP.BY PRL.SECRETARY, AGRE.,HYD.,& 2 OTRS.

WP/5773/2013 · 2025-08-31

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010466492013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NOs: 4260 & 5773 of 2013 WRIT PETITION NO: 4260 of 2013 Between: 1. G PRABHAVATHI, ANANTAPUR DIST, W/O.G.GIRIDHAR REDDY, AGE:30 YEARS, OCC:LICENSE OF AGRO RYTHU SEVA KENDRAM PENUKONDA, ANANATAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRL SECY DEPT OF AGRL COON HYD 2 OTHERS, REP. BY ITS PIT SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE & CO-OPERATION, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE, HYDERABAD. 3. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, AGRO INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, BELIARY ROAD, ANANTAPUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. MANIKANTESWARA RAO KOTHA 1. K. NARSI REDDY 2 2. GP FOR AGRICULTURE WRIT PETITION NO: 5773/2013 Between: 1. P.G. ANITHA, ANANTAPUR DIST., OCC:LICENSE OF AGRO RYTHU SEVA KENDRAM R/O.D.NO.2/386, YELLANUR VILLAGE & MANDAL, MAIN ROAD, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVT OF A P REP BY PRL SECRETARY AGRE HYD 2 OTRS, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE & CO-OPERATION, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE HYDERABAD. 3. THE REGIONAL MANAGER AGRO INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT, CORPORATION LTD., INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, BELLARY ROAD, ANANTAPUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K. NARSI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR AGRICULTURE 2. MANIKANTESWARA RAO KOTHA The Court made the following: COMMON ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri K. Narsi Reddy, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners and Sri T. Raghu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Agriculture and Sri Manikanteswara Rao Kotha, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.3. 2. Vide Impugned Order dated 24.01.2013 (Ex.P.1), the entrepreneurships of the ARSK, Penukonda and Yellanur were cancelled. The Writ Petitioners 3 herein are the licensees of ARSK (Agro Rythu Seva Kendram) and are challenging the said Impugned Order dated 24.01.2013 (Ex.P.1) (in both the Writ Petitions) 3. Vide Interim Orders dated 13.02.2013 in W.P.No.4260 of 2013 and 27.02.2013 in W.P.No.5773 of 2013, this Court ordered Interim Suspension of the Impugned Order dated 24.01.2013 (Ex.P.1), and since then, the said Order has remained suspended. 4. Sri Manikanteswara Rao Kotha, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.3, has submitted Written Instructions furnished by the Regional Manager, Agro Industries Development Corporation Limited, dated 28.08.2025. Copy of it is supplied to the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners and the same is taken on record. 5. He would submit that the Government of Andhra Pradesh, in the year 2019, initiated and established the system of Rythu Bharosa Kendras (RBKs) to cater to the needs of the farming community at the village level. Accordingly, all seasonal agricultural inputs required during the crop seasons have been supplied through the Rythu Bharosa Kendras and no activities or schemes are being implemented through Agro Rythu Seva Kendram (ARSK). 6. Sri Manikanteswara Rao Kotha, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.3, therefore submits that the ARSK is no longer in existence, and as such, the Writ Petitioners are not entitled to any relief. 7. In view of the closure of the Agro Rythu Seva Kendram (ARSK) in the year 2019 and the fact that the Government has since been discharging agricultural functions through Rythu Bharosa Kendras (RBKs), this Court is of the view that nothing survives in this Writ Petitions. 8. Accordingly, the Writ Petitions are disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 4 9. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 01.09.2025 DSV 5 234 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NOs: 4260 & 5773 of 2013 01.09.2025 DSV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI 6 MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NOs: 4260 & 5773 of 2013 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 01.09.2025 GRKP, J Writ Petitions are disposed of as infructuous. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV 7