Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38246 (AP)

Uppala Venkata Manikanta, v. The Union of India,

WP/33970/2018 · 2025-08-13

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010705022018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 33970/2018 Between: 1. UPPALA VENKATA MANIKANTA,, S/O. UPPALA SUBRAMANYAM, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, OCC . UNEMPLOYEE, R/O. 13-2-18, KOTILINGALAPETA, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM URBAN CITY, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM URBAN, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENSE(INDIAN NAVY), NEW DELHI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, INDIAN COAST GUARD(DGICG), COAST GUARD HEAD QUARTER(CGHQ), LOCATED AT NEW DELHI. 3. THE DIRECTOR RECRUITMENT, COAST GUARD HEAD QUARTER, SELECTION BOARD NOIDA, NEW DELHI. 4. THE REGIONAL HEAD QUARTEREAST, REGION AND VISHAKAPATNAM, SIX COAST GUARD STATION, (TUTICORI VISHAKAPATNAM), VISHAKAPATNAM, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the 2 High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS to declare the action of the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner for issuing hall ticket to participate in the written examination though he was fully eligible and submitted his application through online is illegal arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of constitution of India with a consequential direction to the respondents to consider the claim of the Petitioner for issuing hall ticket to participate in the written examination along with others the examination Scheduled commence from 20.09.2018 onwards and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to participate in the written examination commencing from 20.09.2018 by issuing hall ticket and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAVINDER ALKUCHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 33970 of 2018 The Court made the following Order: This Court after perusing the earlier proceedings gave a direction on 24.07.2025, to list the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. However, today also, there is no representation on either side. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 14.08.2025 PSA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 33970 of 2018 Date: 14.08.2025 PSA