Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3824 (JHR)

SUTILAL HEMBROM v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.A(DB)/499/2025 · 2025-05-09

Ambuj Nath, Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. 2025:JHHC:13984-DB THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 499 of 2025 Sutilal Hembrom, aged about 28 years, son of Supol Hembrom, resident of Village Taplajhora, P.O. & P.S. Gurufela, District Kokrajhar, Assam ... Appellant Versus State of Jharkhand … Respondent --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH For the Appellant : Ms. Tejaswi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Gautam Rakesh, A.P.P. --- Order No. 02 Dated 09th May, 2025 I.A. No. 2522 of 2025 Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. This application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning a delay of 52 days in filing the appeal. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in this application, the delay of 52 days which had occurred in filing this appeal is condoned and this I.A. is allowed and disposed of. Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 499 of 2024 This appeal is directed against the order dated 27.09.2024 passed in Misc. Criminal Application No. 133 of 2024 in connection with S.T. No. 120 of 2023 arising out of Hiranpur P.S. Case No. 111/2022 by learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Pakur, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. It has been alleged that in a petrol pump some miscreants had entered into and demanded money. They had assaulted the informant and other persons with Danda and butt of a country made pistol. While escaping the accused persons had exploded a bomb and snatched two mobiles. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant that the First Information Report was instituted against unknown persons. Subsequently, however the appellant was apprehended and he was identified in the Test Identification Parade. Learned counsel submits that no incriminating material was recovered from the possession of the appellant who is in custody since 13.01.2023. It has been submitted that Neutral Citation No. 2025:JHHC:13984-DB some of the co-accused persons have been granted bail by this Court in Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 109 of 2024 and Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 994 of 2023. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant. Regard being had to the aforesaid facts, we while setting aside the order dated 27.09.2024 passed in Misc. Criminal Application No. 133 of 2024 in connection with S.T. No. 120 of 2023 arising out of Hiranpur P.S. Case No. 111/2022 by learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Pakur, direct that the appellant be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like mount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Pakur in connection with S.T. No. 120 of 2023 arising out of Hiranpur P.S. Case No. 111/2022. This appeal is allowed. (RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY, J.) MK (AMBUJ NATH, J.)