Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38238 (AP)

BSVR JOGA RAO @ BULUSU SRINIVASA VENKATA RAMANA JOGA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/10266/2022 · 2025-02-04

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010700212022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10266/2022 Between: Bsvr Joga Rao @ Bulusu Srinivasa Venkata Ramana Joga Rao and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. K JYOTHI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. SARIPALLI SUBRAHMANYAM 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10266/2022 ORDER: The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short, “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the Petitioners/ Accused Nos.1 to 3, seeking quashment of the proceedings pending against them in C.C.No.2079 of 2022 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate (Special Mobile) Court, Vizianagaram. 2. Heard Sri A.Pavan Kumar, learned Counsel representing Sri K. Jyothi Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri S.Subrahmanyam, learned Counsel for the respondent No.2 and Ms. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petition may be disposed of without causing any prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners, by dispensing the presence of the Accused Nos. 2 and 3 before the Trial Court and with regard to A1, the petition may be dismissed as not pressed. 4. Learned Counsel for the respondent No.2 would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 5. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal petition is disposed of for A2 and A3. However, the presence of the petitioners/A2 and A3 before the Trial Court is dispensed with unless their presence is specifically directed by 3 the Trial Court. The Criminal Petition with regard to A1 is dismissed as not pressed. However, the petitioners are at liberty to raise all the contentions before the Trial Court in their defence. Learned Trial Judge may appreciate the same and take appropriate decision according to law. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 04.02.2025 UPS 4 16 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.10266 of 2022 Dt.04.02.2025 UPS