Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 38223 (DEL)

DEEPALI KATYAL v. UNION OF INDIA

W.P.(C)/15117/2025 · 2025-09-26

Sachin Datta

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 15117/2025 DEEPALI KATYAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Samrat Nigam (Sr. Adv) along with Mr. Bhuvanesh Sehgal, Ms. Arpita Rawat, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Dixit (CGSC) along with Mr. Umar Hashmi, Mr. Mayank Upadhyay, Mr. Harshit Chitransh, Ms. Iqra Sheikh, Advs. for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA % 10.10.2025 O R D E R 1. The present application has been filed by the petitioner alleging non- compliance of the directions contained in the order dated 26.09.2025. The said order inter-alia directs as under:- CM APPL. 63828/2025 (on behalf of the petitioner seeking compliance of order dt. 26-09-2025) “3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking that the respondent be directed to inform the petitioner as to whether there exists any Look Out Circular (LOC) against the Petitioner. 4. Considering the limited relief sought by the petitioner, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent / Bureau of Immigration to intimate to the petitioner, as to whether there is any subsisting LOC qua the petitioner. 5. Let the same be done expeditiously and preferably within 10 days from today. 6. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. 7. Order Dasti.” 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the requisite information has not been provided to the petitioner despite directions contained in the said order. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2025 at 12:17:50 3. During the course of hearing, it is informed by Mr. Ashish Dixit, learned CGSC, that there has been a ‘Look Out Circular’ (LOC) in subsistence qua the petitioner issued at the behest of the Enforcement Directorate, since prior to the date of filing of the present petition. 4. Since the limited grievance as articulated by the petitioner in the present petition stands redressed, no further orders are required to be passed. 5. Needless to say, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail appropriate legal remedies if aggrieved by the aforesaid LOC. SACHIN DATTA, J OCTOBER 10, 2025/uk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2025 at 12:17:50