APHC010703902022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION No. 10326 of 2022 Between: Smt. Shaik Jamilunnisa Begum ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. POKALA ADISESHU BABU Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. GHANTASALA UDAYA BHASKAR 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731 has been filed, by the Petitioner/A.2, seeking quashment of the Proceedings against her in CC No.4530 of 2021 on the file of the Court of IV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, for the offences punishable under Section 498-A IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 2. Heard Sri Pokala Adiseshu Babu, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.1/State. Perused the material on record. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Petitioner/A.2 is the mother-in-law of respondent No.2. Petitioner is a widow aged about 60 1. For short ‘the Code’ 2 years and that she was falsely implicated in this case only to harass her and to put pressure on A.1. Further, except bald and omnibus allegations, nothing in specific was attributed against her. Even as per charge sheet allegations, no prima facie case is made out against her. Respondent No.2 gave a false complaint against the Accused and basing on the same, Police registered the crime and after completion of investigation, Police filed Charge Sheet against A.1 to A.4. Seeking quashment of the case against the Petitioner/A.2 filed the present Criminal Petition. 4. Learned counsel would further submit that the presence of the Petitioners may be dispensed with before the Trial Court and the Criminal Petition may be disposed of. 5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 6. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Petition is disposed of and the presence of the Petitioner/A.2 before the Trial Court is dispensed with, except on the specific dates as directed by the Trial Court. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No. 10326 of 2022 04.02.2025 Mjl /*