Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3822 (RAJ)

SHYAM LAL GURJAR S/O SH. ROOP LAL GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/778/2025 · 2025-05-02

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:18519] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 778/2025 Shyam Lal Gurjar S/o Sh. Roop Lal Gurjar, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Fagno Ka Khera Post Mangrop, Tehsil Hamirgarh District Bhilwara ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Principal Secretary - Law, Department Of Law And Legal Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Additional Chief Secretary -Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Javed Khan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 02/05/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide letter dated 31.01.2024 issued by the Government of Rajasthan (Law and Legal Affairs Department), all District Magistrates/Collectors were directed to prepare a panel of Advocates after consultation with the District & Sessions Judge of the respective districts and provide the same to the Government for making appointments on the post of Public Prosecutor/Addl. Public Prosecutor/Special Public Prosecutor in respective districts. Counsel submits that petitioner also submitted an application along with requisite documents and considering his standing at Bar, his name was recommended in the [2025:RJ-JP:18519] (2 of 2) [CW-778/2025] panel of advocates proposed to be appointed on the post of Public Prosecutor/Addl. Public Prosecutor/Special Public Prosecutor in the Courts of Bhilwara (Raj.). Counsel submits that some appointments have been made but still one post is lying vacant. Counsel submits that several months have passed but till date, appointment order has not been issued without any reason. In these circumstances, a representation was submitted by the petitioner on 08.11.2024 for appointing him on the post of Addl. Public Prosecutor but his representation has not been decided till date. At this stage, learned counsel is confining his prayer to seek directions to the respondents to decide his representation submitted on 08.11.2024. Considering overall facts and circumstances of the case and further considering the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, I deem it just and proper to direct respondent No.2 to decide the representation filed by the petitioner on 08.11.2024 within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. With the aforesaid directions, this civil writ petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /52