1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.17596 of 2025 Decided on: 13th November, 2025 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sukhbir …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Mr.L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocates General and Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 4. Mr. Rangil Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.5. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Rangil Singh, learned counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of the respondents No. 1 to 4 and respondent No.5, respectively. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioner’s grievance is that even though she is in possession of requisite length of service for the purpose 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 of pension under Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 but depsite repeated representation preferred to the respondents, her case for pension has not been processed as yet. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner would be satisfied in case respondents are directed to decide the representation preferred by the petitioner on 02.09.2025 (Annexure P-3) within time bound schedule. Learned Additional Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 02.09.2025 (Annexure P-3) in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua November 13, 2025 Judge yogesh