Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CWP-8751 of 2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 114 CWP-8751 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision:27.03.2025 Mandeep Kaur
....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA **** Present: Mr. Sandeep Kumar Bokolia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rajesh Sehgal, Addl. A.G., Punjab for respondents No.1 to 4. **** DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA
, J. (Oral)
1. In the present petition, the petitioner is challenging the appointment of respondent No.7, who has been appointed on the post of Salesman.
2. It is a case of learned counsel for the petitioner that in fact respondent No.7 has been appointed without conducting any interview.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions from the petitioner, submits that at this stage, he will be satisfied if a direction may be given to respondent No.3 to decide the representation dated 04.03.2025 (Annexure P- 1), in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. DINESH 2025.03.27 04:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CWP-8751 of 2025 (O&M) 2
3. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider and decide the representation dated 04.03.2025 (Annexure P-1), within a period of 03 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law.
(DEEPINDER SINGH NALWA)
JUDGE March 27, 2025
dinesh Whether speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH 2025.03.27 04:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document