IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29533 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-920 Year-2024 Thana- BARH District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Tunni @ Umesh Singh @ Umesh Kumar S/O Narayan Singh R/o vill - Lalitpur Agwanpur, P.s.- Barh, Distt.- Patna 2. Sunny Singh S/o Anoj Kumar Singh @ Anuj Singh R/o vill - Lalitpur Agwanpur, P.s.- Barh, Distt.- Patna 3. Jitesh Singh @ Jitesh Kumar S/o Arjun Singh R/o vill - Lalitpur Agwanpur, P.s.- Barh, Distt.- Patna 4. Surendra Singh @ Surendra Prasad Singh S/o Late Ram Pukar Singh R/o vill - Lalitpur Agwanpur, P.s.- Barh, Distt.- Patna 5. Sonu Singh @ Sonu Kumar S/o Anoj Singh @ Anuj Singh R/o vill - Lalitpur Agwanpur, P.s.- Barh, Distt.- Patna 6. Anoj Kumar Singh @ Anoj Kumar S/o Amerika Singh R/o vill - Lalitpur Agwanpur, P.s.- Barh, Distt.- Patna 7. Saurav Kumar @ Kumar Saurav S/o Surendra Singh R/o vill - Lalitpur Agwanpur, P.s.- Barh, Distt.- Patna 8. Amit Singh @ Karu Singh @ Amit Kumar S/o Amerika Singh R/o vill - Lalitpur Agwanpur, P.s.- Barh, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Tej Narayan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shantanu Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 6 02-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 191(1), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352 and 351 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. As per the prosecution case, petitioners, armed with lathi, pistol came to the field of the informant and started Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29533 of 2025(6) dt.02-09-2025 2/2 abusing him. On protest, accused persons assaulted informant’s son with lathi while other accused persons made indiscriminate firing. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. There is land dispute between the parties. 5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. He submits that petitioners have got several criminal antecedents. 6. Considering the nature of accusation and criminal antecedents of these petitioners, their prayer for bail is rejected. Shashi (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T