IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY. THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 28937 OF 2012 Between: 1. E.V.Ramana Reddy, S/o E.Gangi Reddy, aged-33years, 2. J.Gangi Reddy, S/o J.Rama Sidda Reddy, aged-28years. 3. M.Thirupal Reddy, S/o M.Pulla Reddy, aged-37years. 4. C.Chennakesava Reddy, S/o C.Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, aged-22 years 5. A.Nagendra Reddy, S/o Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, aged-25years. All are for the purpose of services is that of R/o H.No.1/172 Chinnasinganapalli Village.Chinnasinganapalli Post, Kadapa District ...PETITIONERS AND 1. The APGENCO, rep. by its Managing Director, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad. 2. The Chief General Manager (HR), APGENCO, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad. 3. The Chief Engineer, Rayalseema Thermal Station, Kalamalla, Kadapa District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring the impugned action of the respondents 1 and 2 in not awarding service weightage marks, and aaa»3fc» further action in selecting the candidates with lesser marks than the petitioner for Trade Test in respect of selection of post of Junior Plant Attendant notified vide notification No.01/CGM(HR)2010, dt.05-01-2011 and Supplementary Notification No.01/CGM(HR)/2011, dt.17-10-2011 as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 16 of Constitution of India. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 36932 OF 2012) Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to allow the petitioner for Trade Test for the post of Junior Plant Attendant, notified vide notification No.01/CGM(HR)2010, No.01/CGM(HR)/2011, dt. 17-10-2011, along with all other candidates now selected under 1:3 ratio, pending disposal of the above writ petition. dt.5-01-2011 and Supplementary Notification I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWVMP. NO: 1435 OF 2014) Between: 1. The APGENCO, rep. by its Managing Director, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad. 2. The Chief General Manager (HR), APGENCO, Vidyut Soudha, Hyderabad. ' 3. The Chief Engineer (O & M), Rayalseema Thermal Station, Kalamalla, Kadapa District. ...PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS AND 1. E.V.Ramana Reddy, S/o E.Gangi Reddy, aged-33years, 2. J.Gangi Reddy, S/o J.Rama Sidda Reddy, aged-28years. 3. M.Thirupal Reddy, S/o M.Pulla Reddy, aged-37years. 4. C.Chennakesava Reddy, S/o C.Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, aged-22 years 5. A.Nagendra Reddy, S/o Vijaya Bhaskar Reddy, aged-25years. All are for the purpose of services is that of R/o H.No.1/172, Chinnasinganapalli Village,Chinnasinganapalli Post. Kadapa District ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim orders dated 03.04.2013 in W.P.M.P.NO. 36932 of 2012 in W.P.NO. 28937 of 2012 in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G V SHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondents: SMT. V SESHA KUMARI & SRI NAGARAJU NAGURU (SC FOR APGENCO) The Court made the following: ORDER APHC010694752012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 28937/2012 Between; ...PETITIONER{S) E.v.ramana Reddy,kadapa,& 4 and Others AND ...RESPONDENT{S) Apgenco Md Hyd 2 and Others Counsel for the Petitioner{S): 1.G VSHIVAJl Counsel for the Respondent(S): I.Nagaraju Naguru,Standing Counsel For APGENCO 2.VSESHA KUMARl The Court made the following; Order:- Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive any further. Hence, the matter has infructuous. become Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- N. NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGj^RAR ^r^OFFICER //TRUE COPY// SE To. 1. One CC to Sri G V Shivaji Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri Nagaraju Naguru, SC for APGENCO, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Smt. V Sesha Kumari Advocate [OPUC] 4. Three CD Copies TF ■t' HIGH COURT DATED:06/02/2025 ORDER WP.No.28937 of 2012 h ^^^^1^ 2025 ^ Current Section DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS