[2025:RJ-JP:48906] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.6299/2025 Shera @ Shersingh Son Of Kheda Singh, R/o Hayatpur, Police Station Sikri Presently Residing At Govindgarh, Police Station Govindgarh, District Alwar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Santram Son Of Dhansingh, R/o Dhadoli Khurd, Police Station Firozpur, Jhirka, District Nuh, Mewat, Haryana. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6512/2025 1. Beenadevi Wife Of Amarsingh, Resident Of Village Hayatpur Police Station Sikri District Deeg. 2. Manoj Son Of Kanniram, Resident Of Village Hayatpur Police Station Sikri District Deeg. 3. Hariom Son Of Kanniram, Resident Of Village Hayatpur Police Station Sikri District Deeg. 4. Raju Son Of Kanniram, Resident Of Village Hayatpur Police Station Sikri District Deeg. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The P.P. 2. Santram Son Of Dhansingh, Resident Of Dhadoli Khurd Station Firojpur Jhirka District Nooh Mewat, Hariyana. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Gupta Mr. Jaswant Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Abhishek Garg JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 02/12/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:48906] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-6299/2025] 1. By way of filing both the instant criminal misc. petitions, a challenge has been led to the impugned order dated 19.06.2025 passed by the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sikri, District Deeg, by which cognizance has been taken against the petitioners under Sections 302, 201 and 120-B IPC and they have been summoned through arrest warrants. 2. Aggrieved by the aforesaid, the petitioners approached the Revisional Court i.e. Additional Sessions Judge, Nagar (Deeg) by way of filing a revision petition, however the same was also rejected vide order dated 12.09.2025 and the order passed by the learned Magistrate has been upheld. 3. Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that after thorough investigation in the matter, the Police has submitted final report negative, but the reasons assigned in the final report have not been considered and on the basis of the evidence of the complainant and other witnesses, now the cognizance has been taken against the petitioners for the above stated offences. 4. After arguing for some time, learned counsels for the petitioners do not want to press these petitions on merits and they have made a prayer for converting the arrest warrants into bailable warrants. 5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for the complainant-respondent opposed the arguments raised by counsel for the petitioners and submitted that a prima facie case is made out against all the accused persons as per the evidence and documents available on the record, hence the Court below [2025:RJ-JP:48906] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-6299/2025] has not committed any error not only in taking cognizance against the petitioners for the above stated offences, but also by summoning them through arrest warrants, hence interference of this Court is not warranted. 6. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record. 7. Considering the fact that the petitioners have not pressed both these petitions on merits, but have confined their prayer to the extent of converting arrest warrants into bailable warrants and looking to the fact that after thorough investigation in the matter, the Police has not found involvement of the petitioners and submitted final report negative and no specific overt-act has been assigned to the petitioners and considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the Trial Court is directed to recall the arrest warrants issued against the petitioners and summon them through bailable warrants. 8. In case, the petitioners appear before the Trial Court on or before 19.12.2025, they be released on bail subject to furnishing personal and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. 9. With the aforesaid observations/directions, both the instant criminal misc. petitions stand disposed of. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/21-22