APHC010699902018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 33857/2018 Between: 1. YENNUDDULA SYAM SUNDER REDDY, S/O Y. NAGI REDDY AGED 41 YEARS, OCC. WORKING AS C.E.O. HUSSAINAPURAM PACS PEAPULLY (M) KURNOOL DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY COOPERATIVE DEPARTMENT AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE REGISTRAR OF COOPERATION AND COMMISSIONER, FOR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES SHYAMALANAGAR, GUNTUR. 3. THE DISTRICT COOP OFFICER, KURNOOL 4. THE DIVISIONAL COOP OFFICER, DHONE REVENUE QUARTERS, DHONE. 5. THE HUSSAINAPURAM PACS LTD, HUSSAINAPURAM, PEAPULLY (M) KURNOOL DIST AP REP.BY ITS PRESIDENT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings in Rc.No.1/2018-19 dated 3-8-2018 issued by the 5th respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, malafide and unreasonable and contrary to the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14,16, and 21 of the Constitution of India and also without properly considering the explanation dated 24-7-2018 submitted by the petitioner and consequently set aside the proceedings in Rc.No.1/2018-19 dated 3.8.2018 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. . Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP) 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “ ... to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings in Rc.No.1/2018-19 dated 3.8.2018 issued by the 5th respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, malafide and unreasonable and contrary to the principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14,16, and 21 of the Constitution of India and also without properly considering the explanation dated 24-7-2018 submitted by the petitioner and consequently set aside the proceedings in Rc.No.1/2018-19 dated 3.8.2018 and pass ...” 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 4. Learned Government Pleader for Cooperation appearing for respondents is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 33857 of 2018 04.07.2025 Mjl /*